|
xun
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: April 03, 2010, 03:24:36 PM » |
|
Hi Ken, Talent can be reflected anywhere within a ZWDS chart while capability is most reflected by Quan Transformation star or a few other stars.
IMHO, capability mean ability to do something. Everyone has a capability in his current age. I believe you don't want to tell Mr Woods and John Terry has an ordinary capability. Take an example, a 2 years old child do not have a capability to write, but 8 years old child have a capability to read and write. But if a 2 years old child have a capability to read and write it is beyond ordinary child capability. And if a 8 years old child can not read and write than could be we can say he don't have a capability for his current age. So, Quan you mean here is ordinary capability or extra ordinary capability ? You choose a very wide range "word", namely "capability". Yes of course I agree Quan also mean capability because this word has a very wide range, it cover many meanings. Again, "short and simple" may give a wrong information to ZWDS enthusiast. That is in real life but not in ZWDS context. If you still have confusion, perhaps you may like to take ZWDS lessons from me.
I enjoy have a ZWDS discussion with you if you are more open. Maybe someday if we have "Yuan", I will take your ZWDS lessons.  But now let's discuss more on this subject. There much more information you can share if you are willing to share.  Just have fun, xun
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Ken
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: April 05, 2010, 10:27:42 AM » |
|
Hi Xun,
I don't know is it due to cultural difference in the usage of English language. To me it is plain that when I tell a sportsman or a businessman they are capable, they would understand I am referring to them being capable in their fields. As for a kid, I would not talk about them being capable without additional reference to their field of capability. eg I will always describe the kid as capable of writing, speaking etc.
Even without bringing kids into the picture, I believe any adult I have been conversing would have no issue understanding when I say "they are capable", which field of capability I am referring to without having to qualify the statement further by listing the field of capability.
For this case, I believe no one will think I am referring to Tiger Woods and John Terry being capable in mathematics or biology.
I am open enough for a metaphysics discussion. Readers have always attested and feedback that I am willing to share and they learnt a lot from me. My style is different in that I am not theory-driven type of researcher that gives chunks of theory to the reader without a conclusion. In addition, I see a discussion as two-way exchange of ideas so if I have not said enough, it is probably because I do not want to be a broadcaster.
In fact I do enjoy chatting with you because you are a eager learner. But at the same time, I do love to get credit when they are due.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
xun
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: April 07, 2010, 09:00:11 PM » |
|
Hi Ken,
I know the word "capable", and when you said capability of Mr Woods, it should golf. But again the word "capability" is not very specific (wide range). That's fine if you want to share as it is.
At least I have tried to give more depth discussion before you go to the next point.
Please go to the next reading to want to share.
Regards,
xun
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Ken
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: April 08, 2010, 12:29:28 AM » |
|
HI Xun,
I believe all of us would prefer to discuss on metaphysics than grammar/vocabulary if we have no problems understanding what each other is trying to say. So I was kind of suprised that while you said you understood, yet bulk of your points centered around the usage of the word "capable".
No hard feelings though, I am always game for a good discussion as long I see there's a good topic and the parties are forthcoming in contributing to the discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
xun
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: April 10, 2010, 12:04:15 AM » |
|
HI Xun,
I believe all of us would prefer to discuss on metaphysics than grammar/vocabulary if we have no problems understanding what each other is trying to say. So I was kind of suprised that while you said you understood, yet bulk of your points centered around the usage of the word "capable".
No hard feelings though, I am always game for a good discussion as long I see there's a good topic and the parties are forthcoming in contributing to the discussion.
Hi Ken, Sorry to direct this topic to grammer/vocab discussion. But we need to make it clear.  I found a DOB where this woman also have a Quan in her Self palace. 11 - Nov - 1982, late Zi hour. If you don't mind, please see the chart. Do you think this woman has a capability ? If yes, what is her capability ? It is easy to say Mr Woods has a capability, but what about an unkown chart ? It is safely to say "you have a capability" when get a Quan in Self Palace ? Regards, xun
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Ken
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: April 10, 2010, 01:37:40 AM » |
|
Hi Xun, It is easy to say Mr Woods has a capability, but what about an unkown chart ? It is safely to say "you have a capability" when get a Quan in Self Palace ?
Agree. Hindsight is 20/20. In fact this is what I have observed of many so-called practitioner who does not dare read much for a stranger chart but tries to show his confidence in reading a celebrity chart. For the record, I am not such a person. http://fengshuiforward.com/forum/index.php/topic,461.0.html1.5 years ago I was already able to see this stranger's capability and potential from her chart. I do not think I need to prove anything to anyone now. Of course it is true I love challenges and will definitely take up your challenge when I have the time to read it. I am currently working on a few very important projects right now. I don't want to be goaded to read in haste and then lose my track record. In fact if my memory did not failed me, I think I have privately demonstrated to you before about my chart reading accuracy. By the way it is not safe to straightaway conclude or predict a person is capable simply because he/she has a Quan in her Destiny. If my post has given you this impression, sorry to hear that. Like I say, a forum is more for fun discussion. I will only go through the detail steps when teaching in a class.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
xun
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: April 10, 2010, 11:01:23 PM » |
|
Hi Ken, Hi Xun, It is easy to say Mr Woods has a capability, but what about an unkown chart ? It is safely to say "you have a capability" when get a Quan in Self Palace ?
Agree. Hindsight is 20/20. In fact this is what I have observed of many so-called practitioner who does not dare read much for a stranger chart but tries to show his confidence in reading a celebrity chart. For the record, I am not such a person. It's great Ken, hope someday I can see your word is true. You are very true to said many practitioner don't dare to do a reading in public forum. I really understand if they don't want to loose their reputation. In fact if my memory did not failed me, I think I have privately demonstrated to you before about my chart reading accuracy.
No. I didn't got it. By the way it is not safe to straightaway conclude or predict a person is capable simply because he/she has a Quan in her Destiny. If my post has given you this impression, sorry to hear that. Like I say, a forum is more for fun discussion. I will only go through the detail steps when teaching in a class.
Ken, I don't expected your teaching in forum.  Actually I just want to make your topic become clearly. Don't make your reader confuse "just with Quan". Before our long discussion, your info about Quan can make reader get wrong. But after some clarification I think it become more clearly. This is the end of Quan discussion.  Regards, xun
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Ken
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: April 11, 2010, 01:17:10 AM » |
|
Hi xun,
Let's put it this way. I have never cherry pick easy choice of chart reading because I respond readily to unknown person's chart. The positive feedbacks or testimonials are all authentic which I can cross my heart for it too. I am at ease with myself at the level of accuracy. But to me, 24 hours each day is definitely too little for me to use, that I have to proritize my time on certain things. So most times, if I did not reply, it is only because I need to work on something higher priority.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Ken
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: June 14, 2010, 12:13:53 AM » |
|
Following up on the discussion of whether a Birth Year Authority star always indicates a good career in high position, this chart will indicate why it does not and yet it is not wrong to say this guy has a career that requires skills or technical talent and yet not in a high ranking position.
The chart is 29 june 1963, Shen hour, male.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
slayer
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: July 03, 2010, 05:50:31 PM » |
|
├─────────┬─────────┬─────────┬─────────┤ │太天台孤蜚破三天旬│破解阴天截天 │天天龙凤 │紫天天火天天 │ │阳马辅辰廉碎台贵空│军神煞喜空伤 │机刑池阁 │微府钺星福使 │ │旺平 │庙 │陷 │旺得庙陷 │ │ │ │禄 │科 │ │病符 │大耗 │伏兵 │官府 │ │丧门 86-95 绝│贯索 76-85 墓│官符 66-75 死│小耗 56-65 病│ │岁驿 ★官禄 辛巳│息神 仆役宫 壬午│华盖 ★迁移 癸未│劫煞 疾厄宫 甲申│ ├─────────┼─────────┴─────────┼─────────┤ │武擎天天天 │命四化[乙机天紫阴] 年龄36岁 命宫在丑│太铃天八 │ │曲羊官空才 │盘类:天盘 火六局 子斗在丑 身宫在亥│阴星虚座 │ │庙庙 │阳历:1975年12月30日22时生 命主巨门│旺得 │ │ │农历:乙卯年11月28日亥时生 身主天同│忌 │ │喜神 │ │博士 │ │晦气 胎│ 大溪水 霹雳火 钗钏金 屋上土 │大耗 46-55 衰│ │攀鞍 田宅宫 庚辰│ 正财 枭神 日主 正官 │灾煞 ★财帛 乙酉│ ├─────────┤乾造:乙卯 戊子 庚戌 丁亥 ├─────────┤ │天文禄天 │ 乙正财 癸伤官 辛劫财 壬食神 │贪地天 │ │同曲存哭 │ 丁正官 甲偏财 │狼劫月 │ │平旺庙 │ 戊枭神 │庙平 │ │ │大运[08月换运]: │ │ │飞廉 │ 丁亥 丙戌 乙酉 甲申 癸未 壬午 辛巳 │力士 │ │岁建 养│ 正官 七杀 正财 偏财 伤官 食神 劫财 │龙德 36-45 帝旺│ │将星 福德宫 己卯│ 1983 1993 2003 2013 2023 2033 2043 │天煞 子女宫 丙戌│ ├─────────┼─────────┬─────────┼─────────┤ │七左陀天天 │天封寡恩 │廉天右天地红 │巨文天 │ │杀辅罗巫寿 │梁诰宿光 │贞相弼魁空鸾 │门昌姚 │ │庙 陷 │旺 │平庙 旺平 │旺平 │ │ │权 │ │ │ │奏书 │将军 │小耗 │青龙 │ │病符 长生│吊客 06-15 沐浴│天德 16-25 冠带│白虎 26-35 临官│ │亡神 父母宫 戊寅│月煞 ★命宫 己丑│咸池 兄弟宫 戊子│指背 身◆夫 丁亥│ └─────────┴─────────┴─────────┴─────────┘ I am sure by now most of us would have been aware of the saga revolving around Tiger Woods. What struck me is that there seems to be 2 ideologically opposite camps of people in their assessment of Woods' sexual trysts with many women as a married man. On the opposing camp, they view Woods as an outright marriage cheat who deserves no pity while the other camp feels that given his superstar and ultra rich status, which sees to many women throwing themselves at him, it is understandable that he had strayed.Out of curiosity, I just wanted to see if he deserves the pity from an astrology point of view. Astrology does not seek to exonerate anyone of his wrong doing but more importantly to assess if he is a victim of circumstances or immoral perpetrator. His birth date is listed as 30 December 1975 and hour is listed as 22:50 hrs. To be sure that these information are really representative of him, I did a quick check of the publicly known events to happen to him so far and it does jive with the 30 Dec 1975, 22:50 hrs birth chart. In Bazi perspective, Woods is a weak Daymaster with plentiful wealth elements and is duly strengthened and positioned to overcome wealth in the current luck pillar. By the way, in Bazi, Wealth represents money as well as woman to male Daymaster. It is small wonder that he amassed so much wealth and bedded so many women. Another case of Excessive Wealth weakens a Weak Daymaster? In Bazi, a weak Daymaster rides more on luck than on his own doing. Now's let switch over to using Zi Wei Dou Shu ("ZWDS") to assess Woods. He has a Tian Liang Transformed Authority Star in his ZWDS Destiny Palace. A Transformed Authority Star usually represents capability and it is small wonder that he did so well in golf. But does that also mean his trysts are borned out of his capability? It is interesting to note that this capability was bestowed on him by the general public, if we use ZWDS to assess the source of this capability. In addition, his Romance Palace shoots stars into his Karma, Travel Marriage Palaces. This can be construed as the women throwing themselves at his feet. The number 1 Romance star, Tan Lang is found in his Romance Palace. i also have lots of wealth but no woman
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
did not have..repeat,...did n
|
|
|
|